We were asked to share a few tips on how to make horror
writing more believable, but itās less realist credibility than a suspension of
disbelief we aim for when we write. That way, readers can trust what theyāre
being shown and can get drawn into the story. Thatās when we know our writing
is working ā when we hook the reader in emotionally and physically. These are
some of the strategies we try:
Do the research
Since coffee-swilling writers locked in small garrets
donāt make for the most exciting protagonists, at some stage we all have to go
beyond the famous advice to āwrite what you knowā. In The Mall we drew on our shared fear of shopping malls and
consumerism, and in The Ward we mined
our collective experiences at the wrong end of a scalpel, but when it came to
our third novel, The New Girl, we chose
to delve into topics that were way beyond our personal experience, including paedophilia
and the phenomenon of reborn dolls.
And for Under Ground,
our fourth novel, we took an almighty leap out of our comfort zone. It meant doing
a great deal of research on the setting (a luxury survival bunker in Maine),
various disaster scenarios (some of which will definitely have us blacklisted
with the CIA), as well as imagining the lives of a group of survivalist characters
who came from a vast array of different backgrounds from ours, and all of whom had
different motivations for investing in the end of the world. Itās ideal to travel
to the location youāve chosen to write about, but this isnāt always possible
with a writerās budget and time constraints, especially if itās halfway across
the world, so reading local books, watching documentaries about the place and
people helps build a picture of an unfamiliar place, as does a virtual visit
with Google Earth.
We also sought out experts in the area we were writing
about and were surprised by just how generous people are with their time. Most
people just want to be asked to share what they know. We spoke at length with an
architect who advised us on a possible layout for the building, while a
security expert and ex-mercenary shared insider info about everything from automatic
weapons to the type of knife one of our more gung-ho characters might use. We
read several online accounts of the prepping philosophy, as well as working
through many documentaries.
But ⦠after doing all that research, you need to be
selective with it. Too much information can become boring and get in the way of
the story ā fiction readers dread the āinfo-dumpā. In the end, only a tiny portion of our new
arsenal of facts made it into the book.
Let characters
live
If youāve written a detailed synopsis or plan before
starting the book, itās tempting to force characters to stick to pre-determined
actions to keep the plot moving forward. But many writers talk about characters
having their own minds and taking on a life of their own in the story. Itās a
clichƩ of writing-process columns for a reason. Characters really do reveal
themselves and become clearer to you as you write. Whether you believe itās a
mystical process or sheer psychology, if you force a character into a situation
that clashes with his or her internal motivation, you might lose your readerās
trust and belief in the story. Donāt be afraid to change those early plans.
Keep reworking until your charactersā motivations and reactions are internally
consistent.
Describing fear
āShe was now really really scaredā, though tempting to
write, doesnāt engage the reader much. Donāt just focus on the mental effects
of fear, but the physical as well ā for example, the taste of adrenaline, the
speeding pulse ā your readers will find themselves breathing faster, their
hearts racing if you suggest it to them. We want them to have a physical reaction
to the story, just as much as theyāre looking for excitement.
Also remember that different charactersā reactions to
fear will differ. Some will get snappish and defensive, others will become
withdrawn and introspective. Some will give up. Know your characters and be
consistent.
Less is more
H.P. Lovecraft, who knew a thing or two about scaring the
crap out of people, said: āNever state a horror when it can be suggested.ā Over-describing
can blanch a scene of its power. The boogeyman is always scarier when you canāt
see all of him. If you leave gaps and dark corners for your readers to imagine
their way into, theyāll fill those spaces with their own deepest fears. Youāll
be using their fears to make the book more engaging and invigorating than you
could do alone, sinking your hook into them deeper than you could ever reach
yourself.
Under Ground by S L Grey, published by Pan Macmillan, £12.99
Comments
Post a Comment