Author interview with Rjurik Davidson
Author bio:
Rjurik Davidson, a young Australian author who won the Aurealis Award
for Best Newcomer some years ago, has been writing about the city of
Caeli-Amur for nearly a decade. His debut novel, Unwrapped Sky
is set in this city-state where magic and technology are
interchangeable; where minotaurs and sirens are real; where
philosopher-assassins and seditionists are not the most dangerous
elements in a city alive with threat. During the day, the ordinary
citizens do what they must to get along. But at night, the spirit of the
ancient city comes alive, to haunt the old places...
Hi Rjurik, Welcome over to The Book
Plank and for taking your time answer these few questions.
BP:
First off, could you give us a short introduction as to who Rjurik Davidson is?
What are your hobbies, likes and dislikes?
RD:
Asking someone about themselves is a pretty fraught thing. The early jazz
musician Jelly Roll Morton used to frequently declare that he invented Jazz (he
didn’t) and lie about his age to fit this story. It’s not, of course, than everyone
is going to lie like Jelly Roll, but rather that we select a series of facts
about ourselves which match our self-image. That qualification aside, I’ll tell
you a few things. I’ve always tried to live a varied life, and have done many
jobs. One of my qualities is curiosity. I love learning new things. There’s too
much to know in this world. My interests include from quantum physics, ancient
history, political theory, psychology and psychoanalysis. I’ve lived around the
world (though Australian, I’m now in Europe), worked as a cook, clerk, lecturer,
and builder. I speak French. I love to see things I’ve never seen before. I
love to meet unusual people. I’m very loyal but don’t often forgive people who
have treated me poorly.
BP:
Unwrapped Sky is your debut. When and
where did you decide that you wanted to become an author?
RD: I first wanted to become a writer in my teenage years. Before that I wanted to be a scientist, though I don’t know if I really knew what that mean. Anyway, I loved reading – and read indiscriminately. For quite a few years in my late teens I didn’t read any genre, but was deeply interested in absurdist theatre, ‘postmodern’ fiction (Calvino, Borges, etc). Then I became interested in politics. But when I was at university, I discovered ‘New Wave’ science fiction of the 1960s, and then I started to realise I wanted to write speculative fiction.
RD: I first wanted to become a writer in my teenage years. Before that I wanted to be a scientist, though I don’t know if I really knew what that mean. Anyway, I loved reading – and read indiscriminately. For quite a few years in my late teens I didn’t read any genre, but was deeply interested in absurdist theatre, ‘postmodern’ fiction (Calvino, Borges, etc). Then I became interested in politics. But when I was at university, I discovered ‘New Wave’ science fiction of the 1960s, and then I started to realise I wanted to write speculative fiction.
BP:
There are some amazing ideas behind Unwrapped
Sky, what gave you the inspiration to write this story?
RD:
When I became interested in politics, it wasn’t the politics of everyday government
decisions (I still have trouble following the details of that), but rather the
grand events of history: great social and religious movements, revolutions and
counter-revolutions, wars and depressions. When I was about twenty years old, I
wanted to write a novel where magicians formed an oppressed caste and revolted.
I didn’t know how to write it at the time. The New Weird hadn’t happened and anyway,
I was doing other things. When I returned to fiction after getting a doctorate,
I attended Clarion South, came up with the fantastic city of Caeli-Amur, and
all kinds of influences started to seep in: my interest in ancient myth and
history, my interest in science and mathematics (when I first attended
university, I studied maths), my attraction to weird fiction, my interest in
historical revolutions and radicals. It all came together in Unwrapped Sky.
BP:
Writing a debut is a daunting task, how did you tackle it?
RD:
A bit at a time, and facing many challenges. Unwrapped Sky has three characters, and their stories entwine. That
took some organising. What you gain in richness you pay for in pain. The trick
is not to freak out and just keep doing bits and pieces every day. That’s the
basic truth about writing: stick to the process and you’ll get there in the
end.
BP:
Now that you have written your debut, did you gain valuable experience that you
will be applying in your future works?
RD:
Like anything, you get better with practice. That doesn’t mean your future work
will necessarily be better, but in general you become more proficient. I
think my next book, called The Stars
Askew, is more ‘fluid’ and ‘moves more easily’ than Unwrapped Sky. I was more confident when I wrote it.
BP:
Unwrapped Sky is out this April. If
you would have to sell your book with a single sentence how would it go?
RD:
“I’m not saying that on your death bed you’ll regret not reading Unwrapped Sky. I’m not saying that. Not
exactly.” Damn, that’s three sentences. Sorry. How about: “Revolution,
betrayal, redemption - the fantastic city of Caeli-Amur will never be the same.”
BP:
There are many debuts this year, where do you think Unwrapped Sky sets itself apart with amongst the others?
RD:
Oh, that I couldn’t answer. The number of books coming out staggers me. All
those writers! Don’t they have anything better to do?
BP:
Did you encounter any specific problems when you were writing Unwrapped Sky?
RD:
Plot problems. The whole thing became so unwieldy that I kept having to go back
and rethink it. In its final state I think it has a nice balance between
complexity and ease, but that took some work.
BP:
What was the hardest part when you were writing Unwrapped Sky?
RD:
Finding the time to write when you had to make a living. For some years I
taught at university as a sessional tutor and lecturer. Even though I was more
qualified than many of the full-time employees there, I was still (as all
sessional teachers are) overworked, underpaid and exploited horribly. This was
the chief reason Unwrapped Sky took
so many years to finish.
BP:
Besides the hardest part, which chapter or scene or character did you enjoy
writing about the most?
RD:
Generally I enjoy writing action sequences – they tend to fly onto the page –
but there are that many in Unwrapped Sky.
There is a scene where the main character Kata meets the imprisoned Siren (as
in the mythic creature), who is called Paxaea. They see something of themselves
in each other, and fairly spontaneously embrace each other. There are little
moments through the book like that which I enjoyed a lot.
BP:
If you would be given the chance to rewrite a specific part of the book before
the publishing date would you do so? And if yes, which part and why?
RD:
Yes, if there was one thing I’d change a little, it is the way the seditionist
movement – the revolutionaries of Caeli-Amur – are isolated from the people.
I’d include more interaction between them, so the seditionists didn’t seem such
an isolated group. Then again, there’s much more of that interaction in the
next book, The Stars Askew
BP:
Unwrapped Sky left the story with a
lot of room for the sequel, can you give us a sneak peek of what is in store
for us?
RD:
As I’ve mentioned above, the next book is called The Stars Askew (out April 2015, I’d say). It’s a sequel. I can’t
give too much away, except to say that shortly after the end of Unwrapped Sky, things haven’t gone as
expected. That’s currently with my editors. The first draft is done. After that
comes the third book, The Black Sun.
Hopefully I’m contracted for that and I can get it done by April 2016.
BP:
Now that Unwrapped Sky will be
published do you have other projects that you wish to persue in the near
future?
RD:
At the moment, I’m writing a steampunk novel set in an Alternate Australia.
Here’s a fragment from the synopsis: “In Melbourne’s Museum, a wonderful exhibit of new technologies arrives,
filled with splendorous mechanisms, including automatons of all kinds of
creatures. When the central exhibit of the exhibition, the “clockwork man” goes
missing, librarian and strong-willed suffragette Eugenie (Gene) Healy is asked
by the burned out detective, John Lynch to help him with the investigation. The
trail leads them to opium dealers and spiritualists, industrialists in the
halls of a powerful men’s club, to a rural utopian community who have rejected
the modern technologies, and into the hideout of one of the last bushrangers. They
encounter the remnants of the megafauna such as marsupial lions that roam the
forests and giant lizards that laze languorously by billabongs. In the desert,
they find a secret, hidden for millennia which will change things forever.”
BP:
Everyone enjoys science fiction and fantasy in their own way. What do you like
most about it?
RD:
The best of it is a thought experiment, which not only gives us a sense of
wonder, but also lets us think about our own world differently. It’s a warped
mirror that shows us the world anew.
BP:
And just lastly, if you would have to give your top 5 favorite books, which
would they be?
RD:
Ahg. Uhg. You just broke my brain. I’ll give you five authors who were
important to me, in no particular order, and with some thoughts in parenthesis.
Eugene Ionesco (how do we make meaning?), Ursula K. Le Guin (how do we live
ethically and ethically as political beings?), Leo Tolstoy (life in the face of
the immensity of history), Thomas M. Disch (gritty, almost realist science
fiction), Kelly Link (those short stories – wow!)
BP:
Thank you very much for your time Rjurik and good luck with your future
writing!
RD:
Thanks for having me.
Comments
Post a Comment